Seguimiento de las recomendaciones del Informe de Posicionamiento Terapéutico sobre el tratamiento con anticoagulantes orales en pacientes ancianos con fibrilación auricular. Estudio ESPARTA / Adherence to recommendations of the Therapeutic Positioning Report about treatment with oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. The ESPARTA study

Fundamento y objetivo: Evaluar en la práctica clínica el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones del Informe de Posicionamiento Terapéutico (IPT) de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios sobre el tratamiento con anticoagulantes orales en pacientes≥75 años con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) atendidos en unidades de Medicina Interna en España. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal y multicéntrico, en el que se incluyeron 837 pacientes≥75 años con FANV en tratamiento estable con anticoagulantes orales durante los 3 meses previos a la inclusión y que hubiesen iniciado dicho tratamiento antes de comenzar el período de inclusión. Resultados: La edad media fue de 83,0±5,0 años, el CHADS2 medio 3,2±1,2, el CHA2DS2-VASc 5,0±1,4 y el HAS-BLED 2,1±0,9. El 70,8% de los pacientes estaba en tratamiento con antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) y el resto con anticoagulantes orales de acción directa (ACOD). El 65,6% de los pacientes con AVK no siguieron las recomendaciones del IPT frente al 43,0% de los pacientes con ACOD (p<0,0001). En el caso de los pacientes con AVK, el motivo principal para ser considerado como no adecuado fue presentar un mal control de la anticoagulación y no cambiar a un ACOD, mientras que en el caso de los ACOD fue recibir una dosis inadecuada según el IPT. Conclusiones: En un porcentaje elevado de pacientes ancianos con FANV anticoagulados en España no se siguen las recomendaciones realizadas por el IPT, especialmente con los AVK, al no realizarse el cambio a ACOD a pesar de un tiempo en rango terapéutico inadecuado

Background and objective: To evaluate the adherence to the recommendations in clinical practice performed by the Therapeutic Positioning Report (TPR) of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Sanitary Products about the treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients aged≥75 years old with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated in Internal Medicine departments in Spain. Patients and methods: Observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study in which 837 patients aged≥75 years old with NVAF, with stable treatment with oral anticoagulants at least 3 months before inclusion, and that had started treatment with oral anticoagulants before the inclusion period were included. Results: Mean age was 83.0±5.0 years old, mean CHADS2 score 3.2±1.2, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.0±1.4, and mean HAS-BLED score 2.1±0.9. A percentage of 70.8 of patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and the rest of patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). A percentage of 65.6 of patients treated with VKA did not follow the recommendations made by the TPR compared with 43.0% of patients treated with DOACs (P<.0001). In the case of VKA, the main reason for being considered as not appropriate according to the TPR was having poor control of anticoagulation and not switching to DOACs, whereas in the case of DOACs, it was not receiving the adequate dose according to the TPR. Conclusions: In a high proportion of anticoagulated elderly patients with NVAF in Spain, the recommendations performed by the TPR are not followed, particularly with VKA, since patients are not switched to DOACs despite time in therapeutic range

Satisfaction with oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Although, by itself, atrial fibrillation is associated with an impairment of quality of life antithrombotic therapy may play a role. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who attended internal medicine departments in Spain. METHODS: Patients from two different cross-sectional studies were combined. To measure the satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment, the Anti-Clot-Treatment Scale (ACTS) questionnaire was completed by every patient. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the variables associated with satisfaction of patients receiving oral anticoagulants. RESULTS: A total of 1,309 patients (mean age 78.5±8.4 years; 49.3% men; CHA2DS2VASC 4.9±1.5; HAS-BLED 2.0±0.9) were included in the study, of whom 902 (68.9%) were taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 407 (31.1%) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Overall, satisfaction with oral anticoagulation was high (ACTS Burdens scale 49.69±9.45; ACTS Benefits scale 11.35±2.61). The perceived burdens with anticoagulant treatment were lower in men, as well as in patients with no dependency, normal renal function, who were not polymedicated, or who had moderate bleeding risk. Among patients taking VKA, those subjects with a lower number of International Normalized Ratio (INR) determinations in the last 6 months or with an optimal time in the therapeutic range exhibited a lower perceived burden. Patients taking DOACs (vs VKA) showed a lower perceived burden with anticoagulation. Benefits with anti-coagulation were higher in men, younger patients, those with no dependency, or low bleeding risk. Perceived benefits were higher in patients taking DOACs (vs VKA). CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with oral anticoagulation was high in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, who were attending internal medicine departments daily in Spain. Among patients taking VKA, those subjects with a lower number of INR determinations in the last 6 months or with an optimal time in the therapeutic range exhibited a lower perceived burden with anticoagulant therapy. Patients taking DOACs (vs VKA) showed lower perceived burdens and higher perceived benefits with anticoagulation.

Type and doses of oral anticoagulants and adherence to anticoagulant treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: the ESPARTA study.

AIM: To analyze the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice. PATIENTS & METHODS: Cross-sectional and multicenter study performed in atrial fibrillation patients ≥75 years treated with oral anticoagulants ≥3 months. RESULTS: 837 patients (83.0 ± 5.0 years; CHA2DS2-VASc 5.0 ± 1.4; HAS-BLED 2.1 ± 0.9; 70.8% vitamin K antagonists; 29.2% direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) were included. Poor adherence was observed in 27.9% of patients. Higher scores in the Pfeiffer's test and FRAIL scale were associated with poorer adherence. Among patients treated with DOACs, 62.3% received the lower doses. Having high CHADS2 score and being older were associated with the use of low doses. CONCLUSION: 28% of patients had a poor adherence to anticoagulant treatment. 62% of patients were treated with the lower doses of DOACs.

Adherence to recommendations of the Therapeutic Positioning Report about treatment with oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. The ESPARTA study. / Seguimiento de las recomendaciones del Informe de Posicionamiento Terapéutico sobre el tratamiento con anticoagulantes orales en pacientes ancianos con fibrilación auricular. Estudio ESPARTA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adherence to the recommendations in clinical practice performed by the Therapeutic Positioning Report (TPR) of the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Sanitary Products about the treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients aged≥75 years old with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated in Internal Medicine departments in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study in which 837 patients aged≥75 years old with NVAF, with stable treatment with oral anticoagulants at least 3 months before inclusion, and that had started treatment with oral anticoagulants before the inclusion period were included. RESULTS: Mean age was 83.0±5.0 years old, mean CHADS2 score 3.2±1.2, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.0±1.4, and mean HAS-BLED score 2.1±0.9. A percentage of 70.8 of patients were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and the rest of patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). A percentage of 65.6 of patients treated with VKA did not follow the recommendations made by the TPR compared with 43.0% of patients treated with DOACs (P<.0001). In the case of VKA, the main reason for being considered as not appropriate according to the TPR was having poor control of anticoagulation and not switching to DOACs, whereas in the case of DOACs, it was not receiving the adequate dose according to the TPR. CONCLUSIONS: In a high proportion of anticoagulated elderly patients with NVAF in Spain, the recommendations performed by the TPR are not followed, particularly with VKA, since patients are not switched to DOACs despite time in therapeutic range.

Clinical outcome in patients with peripheral artery disease and renal artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy on the influence of renal artery stenosis on outcome in patients with peripheral artery disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 12-month impact of renal artery stenosis on declining renal function, control of hypertension, and incidence of major cardiovascular events in 100 consecutive patients undergoing angiography for peripheral artery disease was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients had renal artery stenosis: 32 mild, 16 moderate, and 12 severe stenosis. There were no significant differences in either the decline of renal function (2.7 +/- 18% vs 0.9 +/- 16%), control of hypertension (139 +/- 16 vs 139 +/- 22 mm Hg) or number of antihypertensive drugs (1.8 +/- 1.0 vs 1.6 +/- 0.8). Patients with renal artery stenosis had an increased incidence of major cardiovascular events (odds ratio: 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-5.4), but on multivariate analysis its influence disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with peripheral artery disease having renal artery stenosis had similar decline of renal function and control of hypertension. They had an increased incidence of major cardiovascular events, but it may be explained by the confounding effect of additional variables.